Skip to content
Private Preview
Join Waitlist →

Choose a redaction format

Decide whether placeholders, masks, hashes, partial values, removal, or custom labels make the output easiest to use.

Updated 29 May 20266 min readAuthor: Redactorr Support Team · [email protected]Last reviewed: May 2026

Outcome

Your redaction format matches the recipient need: readable context, irreversible sharing, comparison, or removal.

Your progress

Mark each step as you complete it. This is saved only in this browser.

0 / 3 steps complete

Before you start

Know who will receive the output.
Know whether the output needs to preserve meaning, support comparison, or remove values entirely.
Understand that format choice does not replace review.

Visual frame

Review asset

Redaction format choice storyboard

Synthetic format frame only. It explains readability and sharing tradeoffs without presenting a format choice as legal protection.

PurposeRecipient task
FormatPreview first
ReviewStill required

Synthetic frame

Format purpose

Match the format to the recipient task.

Readable context[EMAIL_1]
Partial recognition****1234
Remove value[REMOVED]
The format should serve the recipient task, not just look tidy.

Choose a redaction format workflow frame

Instructional frame for this workflow. Use product screenshots or animation captures after the article copy is stable.

StartChoose the output purpose
ReviewPreview the format
FinishVerify consistency

Guided steps

Follow the task, then check the result.

Choose the output purpose

Use placeholders when readers need context, masks when partial recognition is useful, hashes for comparison workflows, and removal when the value should disappear entirely.

Redaction format options.
Success check: The format choice matches the recipient task.

Preview the format

Preview the output and confirm it still reads correctly. If meaning is lost, choose a more descriptive placeholder or revise the surrounding text.

Before and after redaction format preview.
Success check: The redacted result is both safe enough for the workflow and understandable.

Verify consistency

Check repeated values and categories. Consistent labels can help readers understand relationships without seeing raw private values.

Repeated placeholder or mask consistency check.
Success check: Repeated values behave in the way your workflow expects.

Branch questions

Completion check

The format matches the recipient need.
The output still makes sense.
Repeated values are handled intentionally.

Support boundary

Support can use by default

  • Article slug and selected workflow step.
  • Screen or action name, such as Canvas review, Vault resume, or Share package.
  • Browser, viewport, file type category, and error category when relevant.
  • Synthetic sample shape or redacted sample only after review.
  • Intent ID
  • Article slug
  • App route

Requires your consent

  • User-written description
  • Email address
  • Explicit attachment
  • Redacted sample
  • Support bundle previewed to the user

Not collected by default

  • Raw original document text
  • Full local file paths
  • Pasted private content
  • Unmasked screenshots
  • Replay capture

Safe support summary

Copy a scrubbed handoff.

Redactorr KB support summary

Article: /knowledge-base/choose-redaction-format
Selected issue: The selected format does not appear in export.
Playbook progress: 0/3 steps marked complete

Safe context to include:
- Article slug and selected workflow step.
- Screen or action name, such as Canvas review, Vault resume, or Share package.
- Browser, viewport, file type category, and error category when relevant.
- Synthetic sample shape or redacted sample only after review.
- Intent ID
- Article slug
- App route

Requires explicit consent:
- User-written description
- Email address
- Explicit attachment
- Redacted sample
- Support bundle previewed to the user

Do not include by default:
- Raw original document text
- Full local file paths
- Pasted private content
- Unmasked screenshots
- Replay capture

User note:
- Describe the step and symptom without pasting raw document text, secrets, files, or restoration material.

Article details

Choose a redaction format

Decide whether placeholders, masks, hashes, partial values, removal, or custom labels make the output easiest to use.

Outcome

Your redaction format matches the recipient need: readable context, irreversible sharing, comparison, or removal.

Before You Start

  • Know who will receive the output.
  • Know whether the output needs to preserve meaning, support comparison, or remove values entirely.
  • Understand that format choice does not replace review.

1. Choose the output purpose

Use placeholders when readers need context, masks when partial recognition is useful, hashes for comparison workflows, and removal when the value should disappear entirely.

Check before you continue: The format choice matches the recipient task.

2. Preview the format

Preview the output and confirm it still reads correctly. If meaning is lost, choose a more descriptive placeholder or revise the surrounding text.

Check before you continue: The redacted result is both safe enough for the workflow and understandable.

3. Verify consistency

Check repeated values and categories. Consistent labels can help readers understand relationships without seeing raw private values.

Check before you continue: Repeated values behave in the way your workflow expects.

Completion Check

  • The format matches the recipient need.
  • The output still makes sense.
  • Repeated values are handled intentionally.

Safe Examples

  • [EMAIL_1] for readable context.
  • **1234 or [REMOVED] for workflows that do not need the full value.

If You Need Support

Contact support when:

  • The selected format does not appear in export.
  • Repeated values do not behave consistently after review.

Include only support-safe context:

  • Article slug and selected workflow step.
  • Screen or action name, such as Canvas review, Vault resume, or Share package.
  • Browser, viewport, file type category, and error category when relevant.
  • Synthetic sample shape or redacted sample only after review.

Still stuck?

Copy a safe article handoff.

Start support with the article, the issue, and safe context. Raw document text, files, restoration material, and unredacted screenshots stay out unless you explicitly choose otherwise.

Support can start here
  • Article slug
  • Selected issue
  • Screen name
  • Action name
Redactorr support case

Source: Article playbook: choose-redaction-format
Route: /knowledge-base/choose-redaction-format
Selected issue: The selected format does not appear in export.

Safe context:
- Article slug and selected workflow step.
- Screen or action name, such as Canvas review, Vault resume, or Share package.
- Browser, viewport, file type category, and error category when relevant.
- Synthetic sample shape or redacted sample only after review.
- Article slug
- Selected issue
- Screen name or article section
- Action name

Only include with explicit consent:
- User-written description
- Email address
- Explicit attachment
- Redacted sample
- Support bundle previewed to the user

Do not include by default:
- Raw original document text
- Full local file paths
- Pasted private content
- Unmasked screenshots
- Replay capture
- Hidden diagnostic uploads

User note:
- Describe what you tried and what happened. Do not paste raw document text, secrets, files, restoration material, or unredacted screenshots.

Support case builder

One case format, wherever you start.

This is the same support case shape used by diagnostics and article handoffs.

Safe to include
  • Article slug and selected workflow step.
  • Screen or action name, such as Canvas review, Vault resume, or Share package.
  • Browser, viewport, file type category, and error category when relevant.
  • Synthetic sample shape or redacted sample only after review.
  • Article slug
  • Selected issue
Consent boundary

Private material belongs behind an explicit consent step, not in the initial case.

6 default exclusions

Before you copy0/4 ready
Open safe support guide